Interface outcome
Capture the decisive state, message, value, or control with identifying context.
Acceptance cycle
01PlansFrame scope, roles, entry conditions, and the acceptance calendar.02CasesTurn business intent into observable, decision-grade scenarios.03RunsConduct sessions with traceable outcomes and disciplined retests.Decision record
04DefectsCalibrate impact, ownership, evidence, and closure.05EvidenceAssemble the record behind every acceptance decision.06ReleasesConvert readiness into an explicit, accountable decision.Field desk
TToolkitCalculate release readiness. LLibraryBrowse the UAT inventory. DDemandsSet non-negotiable controls.Current discipline
Make the decision visible before the deadline makes it for you.
Enter the release room →05 · Evidence
Build a decision record that is sufficient, contextual, proportionate, and safe to retain.
Decision-grade proof
Screenshots alone are often weak evidence. Combine the visible result with the context required to interpret it: role, data, time, candidate version, expected outcome, and any downstream record.
Capture the decisive state, message, value, or control with identifying context.
Reference the resulting record, event, document, status, or reconciliation point.
Use concise notes for usability, comprehension, sequence, and operational consequence.
Keep the case, run, defect, fix, retest, and sign-off connected.
Privacy by practice
Prefer representative, non-personal test records wherever the journey permits.
Exclude unrelated panels, notifications, tabs, and background content.
Remove identifiers, credentials, financial details, and secrets in the source artifact.
Keep evidence only as long as the release, regulatory, and audit need requires.
Index the record
Give every evidence item a stable reference tied to case and run.
Mark result proof, defect proof, retest proof, control proof, or decision proof.
Confirm readability, context, redaction, ownership, and storage location.
Resolve missing or ambiguous proof before the release room.
The test
Could an informed reviewer understand what happened, why it matters, and which decision it supports—without asking the tester?